The New York Occasions Editorial Board has endorsed a candidate for mayor in each election cycle since 1897.
REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Picture
In lieu of a standard mayoral endorsement, the New York Occasions Editorial Board on Monday suggested voters towards inserting Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani (D-Queens) on their poll and raised “serious objections” to former Governor Andrew Cuomo’s “ethics and conduct.”
The board, which in 2021 known as for Cuomo’s resignation as governor following a slew of sexual harassment allegations, expressed larger concern in Monday’s editorial with Mamdani than Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021.
“We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers’ ballots,” the editorial reads. “His experience is too thin, and his agenda reads like a turbocharged version of Mr. de Blasio’s dismaying mayoralty. As for Mr. Cuomo, we have serious objections to his ethics and conduct, even if he would be better for New York’s future than Mr. Mamdani.”
The Occasions Editorial Board has endorsed a candidate for mayor in each election cycle since 1897. The Occasions’ opinion editor Kathleen Kingsbury introduced in August 2024 that the paper of file was disposing of native endorsements going ahead.
The editorial board’s endorsements, although not all the time in favor of the last word winner, have lengthy been indicative of a major bump in polls and assist. In 2021, the board endorsed Kathryn Garcia within the democratic main. Garcia misplaced to Adams, who at present occupies Gracie Mansion.
Monday’s editorial adopted a venture revealed final week by the Occasions’ opinion part that includes 15 outstanding New Yorkers’ opinions on the race. Comptroller Brad Lander got here out on prime, with seven of 15 panelists deciding on Lander as their prime choose for mayor. Cuomo and Mamdani, who’re main the pack by a large margin in most polls, got here in far behind tied for second, with two panelists endorsing every.
“Eleven candidates are competing for the Democratic nomination, and many New Yorkers are understandably disappointed by the field. It lacks any candidate who seems likely to be the city’s next great mayor,” Monday’s editorial reads. “For that reason, we are not endorsing a candidate.”
The board wrote that although Mamdani “offers the kind of fresh political style for which many people are hungry during the angry era of President Trump,” the 33-year-old “is running on an agenda uniquely unsuited to the city’s challenges.”
“He is a democratic socialist who too often ignores the unavoidable trade-offs of governance. He favors rent freezes that could restrict housing supply and make it harder for younger New Yorkers and new arrivals to afford housing. He wants the government to operate grocery stores, as if customer service and retail sales were strengths of the public sector. He minimizes the importance of policing,” the editorial reads.
The non-endorsement echoed arguments that Cuomo and different opponents of Mamdani have made concerning the assemblymember’s relative lack of managerial expertise, his comparatively skinny coverage file, and his formidable hopes for housing and price of residing which were criticized as unrealistic.
Although the board didn’t endorse Cuomo and as soon as extra raised its concern from 2021 that “his treatment of women was part of a larger pattern of bullying, self-serving behavior,” it wrote that he’s the candidate within the race with the strongest coverage file.
Spokespeople for Mamdani and Cuomo didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark about Monday’s editorial.
The board referenced the opinion part’s current panel venture, naming Lander, former monetary govt Whitney Tilson, Metropolis Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, former Comptroller Scott Stringer, and State Senator Zellnor Myrie (D-Brooklyn) because the panel’s chosen options for voters dismayed by Mamdani and Cuomo. Lander and Mamdani cross-endorsed one another final week, every urging voters to rank themself first and the opposite second.
“We see arguments for ranking several candidates at the top of the ballot, including Mr. Lander for more progressive voters and Mr. Tilson for more moderate voters,” Monday’s editorial reads. “Although Mr. Cuomo and Mr. Mamdani have dominated the polls, another candidate could still emerge as the Election Day winner.”
New York Metropolis makes use of ranked-choice voting in native elections, which means voters can rank as much as 5 candidates on their poll, permitting their vote to go to their second, third, fourth, or fifth selection if their most most popular candidate or candidates don’t collect sufficient assist. The Although the board suggested towards Mamdani and warned about what a Cuomo mayoralty would possibly convey, it famous that leaving each candidates off of the poll “would be tantamount to expressing no preference between the two.”
“It is similar to voting for neither major-party candidate in a traditional election,” the editorial reads. “If the polls are correct and the race is between Mr. Cuomo and Mr. Mamdani, the thing that matters most on a ballot will be the relative positions of those two candidates.”
The board famous that Mayor Eric Adams’ “evident corruption and sloppy management style” sign that he “does not deserve re-election.” Adams is operating for re-election as an Impartial. As for the Republican main, the board talked about the primary candidate Curtis Sliwa, a radio host, however brushed his candidacy off for lack of any authorities expertise.
“Ultimately, we will be rooting for the success of whoever becomes New York’s next mayor,” the board wrote. “We will also be rooting for a stronger field in the 2029 election.”
Early voting within the Democratic mayoral main started on Saturday and the first election will happen on June 24.
